<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>BananaQuest on Ben Goldsworthy</title>
    <link>https://bengoldsworthy.net/series/bananaquest/</link>
    <description>Recent content in BananaQuest on Ben Goldsworthy</description>
    <category>series</category>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <managingEditor>me&#43;bgrss@bengoldsworthy.net (Ben Goldsworthy)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>admin&#43;bg@bengoldsworthy.net (Ben Goldsworthy)</webMaster>
    <copyright>CC0</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 21:23:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bengoldsworthy.net/series/bananaquest/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>How Fares the Banana Reclamation?</title>
      <link>https://bengoldsworthy.net/blog/posts/how-fares-the-banana-reclamation/</link>
      <category>Reports</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 21:23:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <author>me&#43;bgrss@bengoldsworthy.net (Ben Goldsworthy)</author>
      <guid>https://bengoldsworthy.net/blog/posts/how-fares-the-banana-reclamation/</guid>
      <description>Detailing my ongoing quest to reclaim thousands of pounds temporarily stolen from me by my ever-bungling government.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <a href="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/">wrote at the start of the year</a> about my parlous experience with the British tax and student loan authorities, whilst resulted in me being on the hook for several thousands of pounds in the previous tax year. My goal is to reclaim almost every single penny of that…</p>
<p>…but the bastards won&rsquo;t make it easy.</p>
<aside class="note"><p>As a reminder: when we last left our intrepid hero (<abbr
class="abbr"
title="id est [that is]" lang="la">i.e.</abbr>, me), I had three avenues of reclamation ongoing:</p>
<ul>
<li>amending my tax return for 2024&ndash;25 <abbr
class="abbr"
title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> tax year, where I had overstated my foreign-earned income and understated my foreign-paid tax
<ul>
<li>Goal: reduce my 2024&ndash;25 Income Tax due after tax reductions from £3,011.40 to as little as possible</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>demanding that the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> tell <abbr
class="abbr"
title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> that I&rsquo;ve double-paid for my loan repayments
<ul>
<li>Goal: reduce my 2024&ndash;25 student loan repayments due from £2,323 to £0</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>telling <abbr
class="abbr"
title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> that I will owe them nothing in the 2025&ndash;26 <abbr
class="abbr"
title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> tax year 2025&ndash;26 (or, I hope, ever after)
<ul>
<li>Goal: reduce my predicted 2025&ndash;26 Income Tax due from £3,011.40 to £0</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>…for a total paid of £8,345.80, which I aim to reduce to near enough £0.</p>
</aside>

<h2 id="april" class="subheading">
  April
  <a class="heading-anchor" href="#april">¶</a>
</h2>
<p>I checked on my <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> account and saw that I had a tax credit to claim. That netted me £3,020.82 back; but what was it for? Based on the number I guessed it must be either the predicted 2025&ndash;26 payments or the miscalculated 2024&ndash;25 payments, plus a little bit of interest in either case.</p>
<p>I called <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> and got a self-describedly <q
  itemscope
  itemtype="Quotation">nosy</q> Scottish lady who poked around in my account and said that <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> had told <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> what they needed to, so I should contact <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> instead.</p>
<aside class="note"><p>Whilst I had her attention, I also tried to get to the bottom of why my supposedly-annual student loan statements seem to be issued completely randomly, if at all. For context, here is my list of statements (and I&rsquo;ve added the random assortment of dates that they cover):</p>
  <div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">
<p><picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/how-fares-the-banana-reclamation/images/slc-statements_hu_a3df59411f7a36b0.webp" /><source
srcset="/blog/posts/how-fares-the-banana-reclamation/images/slc-statements_hu_9d480a5684c53534.webp"
media="(max-width: 800px)"
/><source
srcset="/blog/posts/how-fares-the-banana-reclamation/images/slc-statements_hu_4d5efa04d1624ff1.webp"
media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
/>
<img
class="u-photo picture__image"
src="/blog/posts/how-fares-the-banana-reclamation/images/slc-statements_hu_9d480a5684c53534.webp"
width="996" height="849" alt="Student loan statements over the years" loading="lazy"/>
</picture></p>
  <p class="attr">Screenshot by the author</p>
  </div>
</aside>

<p>I called <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr>, where I got a women who sounded like she was falling asleep; she responded to several questions with prolonged silences. I asked her to clarify which of the three corrections the <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> repayment I had received was for and she said it was my 2024&ndash;25 tax return amendment (which I had previously been told wasn&rsquo;t scheduled to be processed until November). When I asked whether they had received the student loan repayment information from the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr>, she passed me on to the <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> student loan team, who told me to contact <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> about them. I reiterated they had sent me here, so she put me on hold whilst she called them; however, I think she pressed the wrong button as I was instead transferred to a rather confused man called Steven who promptly hung up on me.</p>
<p>I called back, got reconnected to the same agent and was told that <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> had passed on the information incorrectly when I had asked them before and that they in fact need to send me a letter to sign, granting them the authority to send an email to <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr>. She also clarified that the credit I had recevied was <em>actually</em> for my predicted 2025&ndash;26 tax return, and that my amended previous year return was still in their queue to process.</p>
<p>I called <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> again and politely explained their fuckup to them. The agent initially denied that they had done anything incorrectly and I spent a while on hold whilst she spoke to their finance department; upon her eventual return, she conceded that they had in fact messed up and that they would send me an email to request my permission to contact <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr>, which should arrive within five days.</p>
<p>In total, I wasted just over an hour and half on all of this, largely spent listening to tinny hold music or navigating (and re-navigating) inpenetrable phone mazes; I ended up writing down a map of the decision tree for each company so that I could more quickly return directly to the appropriate place, and at one point I accidentally took a wrong turn into <q
  itemscope
  itemtype="Quotation">student loan <em>deductions</em></q> which resulted in a recorded message that ended with <q
  itemscope
  itemtype="Quotation">you can hang up now</q>. However, I didn&rsquo;t hang up immediately and, after a short pause, got a <q
  itemscope
  itemtype="Quotation">putting you through</q>; it made me feel like a cut-price Kevin Mitnick.</p>
<p>Four days later, I received the email from <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr>, and I replied granting them permission to tell <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> I had already made all of my student loan repayments from overseas.</p>
<p>Two days later, I received a letter from <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr>. First, they confirmed that the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> had told them I had made repayments of £1,488 already, which they have credited to my tax account (though nothing ever appeared visibly in my account). But, given that they had originally charged me £2,323, that leaves £835 overpaid. Incredibly, they also tried to send me to a dodgy payday loan company, but that&rsquo;s <a href="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/">a story for another day</a>.</p>
<h2 id="may" class="subheading">
  May
  <a class="heading-anchor" href="#may">¶</a>
</h2>
<p>I claimed another tax credit, this time for £1,498.99; the credit for my already-paid student loan repayments, plus a little bit of early payment interest.</p>
<h2 id="june" class="subheading">
  June
  <a class="heading-anchor" href="#june">¶</a>
</h2>
<p>I received, unannounced on June 16, an <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> payment for £1,277.25 direct to my bank account. That number didn&rsquo;t match up to any that I am still expecting, and the <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> account would only say that it was somehow related to my payment.</p>
<p>Then, on June 23, I received a letter (dated June 12) informing me that they have now processed my amended tax return for the 2024&ndash;25 tax year. There is now no mention of any predicted payments for the 2025&ndash;26 tax year (good!), and they have now reduced my Income Tax due after tax reductions from £3,011.40 to £381.20 (which is fair enough!). But then, somehow, they managed to <em>re</em>-include my student loan repayments which now total £2,201:</p>



<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/how-fares-the-banana-reclamation/images/amended-calculation_hu_598e9a25bd2bd236.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/how-fares-the-banana-reclamation/images/amended-calculation_hu_3cb741705cfb6f46.webp"
        media="(max-width: 800px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/how-fares-the-banana-reclamation/images/amended-calculation_hu_65eaba54bd38c2f4.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/how-fares-the-banana-reclamation/images/amended-calculation_hu_3cb741705cfb6f46.webp"
      width="814" height="231" alt="Amended tax calculation from HMRC" loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Photo by the author</p>
</div>

<p><em style="font-size: 5em; font-weight: bold;">CUNTSSSSSS.</em></p>
<p>So I <em>believe</em> that the random repayment of £1,277.25 (or £1,264.20 without the interest) has been derived as follows:</p>
<table>
	<thead>
			<tr>
					<th>Source</th>
					<th>Change</th>
					<th>Running Total</th>
			</tr>
	</thead>
	<tbody>
			<tr>
					<td>Income Tax initially paid</td>
					<td>£3,011.40</td>
					<td>£3,011.40</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
					<td>plus original duplicated student loan repayments</td>
					<td>£2,343.00</td>
					<td>£5,334.40</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
					<td>minus newly-calculated Income Tax</td>
					<td>(£381.20)</td>
					<td>£4,953.20</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
					<td>minus new duplicated student loan repayments</td>
					<td>(£2,201.00)</td>
					<td>£2,752.20</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
					<td>minus the partial credit gained from telling them about the student loan payments I <em>have</em> already made</td>
					<td>(£1,498.99)</td>
					<td>£1,253.21</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
					<td>plus interest</td>
					<td>a little bit</td>
					<td>£1,277.25</td>
			</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<p>But this still leaves £2,548.74 still in play (which is close enough to the £2,582.20 total stated on my amended tax calculation that I assume this is now the only number I need to care about), and I have no idea why the partial credit for my student loan repayments seems to have worked <em>against</em> me, but it seems that everything now seems to hinge entirely on these over- and double-paid student loan repayments.</p>
<p>But I pay whatever the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> calculates as required for my income and country of residence, automatically via Direct Debit. So why are <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> so adamant that I actually owe almost twice that?</p>
<p>I called <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> again, and once again got suckered into going down the &lsquo;student loan <em>deductions</em>&rsquo; route, which I know from experience is a dead end. In a moment of frustration, I discovered that saying &lsquo;skip menu, talk to a human&rsquo; seems to override bypass the recorded voice&mdash;I&rsquo;ve finally discovered a <a href="https://xkcd.com/806/">shibboleet</a>! Then, as I was waiting in the interminable hell of the on-hold music, I thought I  where I think the student loan numbers are coming from.</p>
<p>I have a Plan 2 Undergraduate Loan, plus a Postgraduate Loan. The former means I have to pay 9% of any annual income over the threshold of £29,385, whilst the latter takes 6% over £21,000. When the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> ask for your income each year, you only have the option to put one income source, so I left out my small bits of irregular income from the <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr>. If I then calculate the student loan repayments based only on my French salary, I get a total around £1,600; so that will be the amount I got in credit once I finally got <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> and <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> speaking to one another. But my remaining <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> income was around £8,500, and&mdash;even ignoring the thresholds&mdash;15% of that is only £1,275. Even if I include the difference between my total French income and the taxable amount&mdash;£5,063&mdash;15% of that is only £2,027; nearly £200 less than they&rsquo;ve charged.</p>
<p>But I noticed that the <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> letter says they will tell the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> about my repayments, but nothing appears within the (crap, barely functional) <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> portal. After an hour on the phone to <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> (and being transferred between three different departments) I ended up with an Indian woman in the Student Loans department who did not understand what my issue was, complained about the call quality and said she would call me back to see if it improved; she eventually did and showed me where to find my repayments in the (unintuitive, obtuse) <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> portal. She pointed out that I had received my £1,488 student loan credit on 6 May, and I was both in a hurry for an appointment and confused as to where the remaining unreimbursed money may have come from (given that my recalculated tax bill was only £381.20).</p>
<p>I realised I needed a chart:</p>
<figure
  class="article__figure figure figure--chart"
  role="group"
><div class="chart-container">
      <canvas
        width="auto"
        class="chart"
        id="tax-bill"
      >
        You must enable Javascript to view this chart.
      </canvas>
    </div><figcaption class="figure__caption"><h4 class="figcaption__title">2024&ndash;25 UK tax year bill payment and reimbursement tracker</h4></figcaption></figure>

<p>As far as I can tell, <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> were doing okay on reimbursing me right up until the long-delayed recalculation, where they seem to have correctly reduced my Income Tax due, but then expanded then amount of student loan repayments to maintain the existing balance, even through they had previously returned to me the bulk of this value. In short, <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> have invented £1,366 out of thin air.</p>
<p><i lang="es" title="The struggle continues!">¡La lucha sigue!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Why Did HMRC Send Me to a Payday Loan Company?</title>
      <link>https://bengoldsworthy.net/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/</link>
      <category>Reports</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:13:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <author>me&#43;bgrss@bengoldsworthy.net (Ben Goldsworthy)</author>
      <guid>https://bengoldsworthy.net/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/</guid>
      <description>The robbing bastards at the HMRC managed to send me on to some even more brazenly robbing bastards, but why?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the <a href="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/">start of the year</a>, I detailed how an error on my part, compounded by the phenomenal incompetence of two organs of the British state, resulted in me temporarily owing several thousands of pounds to the taxman. I&rsquo;ll soon follow up with how <a href="/blog/posts/how-fares-the-banana-reclamation/">my efforts to reclaim their ill-gotten gains</a> have progressed, but first I want to take you on an intriguing digression.</p>
<p>In short: after much effort, I finally got (some) of my already-paid student loan repayments credited against my tax bill. But, in the letter confirming this to me, <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> directed me to contact the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> if I wanted to dispute the amount, suggesting a site that I haven&rsquo;t seen before:</p>



<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/slc-letter_hu_518714ba1205ea29.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/slc-letter_hu_1b50e19f60c7b60.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/slc-letter_hu_518714ba1205ea29.webp"
      width="757" height="163" alt="A letter from HMRC telling me to contact SLC if I want to dispute my repayments" loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Photo by the author</p>
</div>

<p>Peculiarily, the domain instead leads to a predatory payday loan company called WageDayAdvance&mdash;<q
  itemscope
  itemtype="Quotation">rates from 48.1% <abbr title="Annual Percentage Rate">APR</abbr> to 1,721% <abbr title="Annual Percentage Rate">APR</abbr></q>:<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1</a></sup></p>



<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/payday-loan_hu_fa99f4d2c617f7a1.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/payday-loan_hu_76974d5a6ae19708.webp"
        media="(max-width: 1200px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/payday-loan_hu_701662960bcdc5ea.webp"
        media="(max-width: 800px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/payday-loan_hu_bed746b8d047affc.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/payday-loan_hu_76974d5a6ae19708.webp"
      width="1892" height="899" alt="Predatory payday loan company" loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Screenshot by the author</p>
</div>

<p>A <a href="https://lookup.icann.org/en">WHOIS lookup</a> on the domain shows that it was last updated in November 2025, though the redirect has been in place since at least <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20250122051707/http://www.studentloanrepayment.co.uk/">January 2025</a>. The site is completely absent from the Wayback Machine throughout 2024, and when it was <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230607075657/http://www.studentloanrepayment.co.uk/">last crawled before then in June 2023</a> it redirected to the official government student loan repayment page.</p>
<p>According to the <a href="https://www.bigdomaindata.com/whois-history/studentloanrepayment.co.uk">history of the domain</a>, it was originally managed by a company called Demys Limited on behalf of the Student Loans Company. They were <a href="https://comlaude.com/homepage/demys-now-part-of-com-laude/">acquired by another company called Com Laude in 2018</a>, who seem to have <a href="https://www.bigdomaindata.com/whois-history/studentloanrepayment.co.uk#whois-history:~:text=4%20July%202023-,Expiry:%202%20August%202024,-REGISTRAR">renewed the domain only once</a> before letting it <a href="https://www.bigdomaindata.com/whois-history/studentloanrepayment.co.uk#whois-history:~:text=%2D%20QUERY%20TIME-,9%20Nov%202024,-%2D%201:19%20AM">lapse by November 2024</a>.</p>



<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/dns-history_hu_d692427f7461b14b.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/dns-history_hu_c7c974363a7469ef.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/dns-history_hu_d692427f7461b14b.webp"
      width="701" height="809" alt="DNS history for studentloanrepayment.co.uk" loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Screenshot by the author</p>
<div class="figure__caption"><p class="figcaption__caption">Three queries, telling a tale of incompetence</p></div></div>

<p>The current registrar of the domain is one Paul Greenhalgh, a sole trader trading as both a <q
  itemscope
  itemtype="Quotation"cite="https://www.dnexperts.com/"><meta
        itemprop="isBasedOn"
        content="https://www.dnexperts.com/"
      />domain name sales, investments and brokerage</q> firm called DNExperts and a Web development business called Potshot (whose own <a href="https://potshot.co.uk/">Web site</a> is almost entirely non-functional):</p>
<p>


<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/whois-1_hu_ab0d7176fd9c0acd.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/whois-1_hu_e4ee9c09c31bacfe.webp"
        media="(max-width: 800px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/whois-1_hu_c58c446d744c7ef2.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/whois-1_hu_e4ee9c09c31bacfe.webp"
      width="1057" height="470" alt="ICANN domain lookup for studentloanrepayment.co.uk" loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Screenshot by the author</p>
</div>




<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/whois-2_hu_7fa545176147def9.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/whois-2_hu_9fe55b76698f615.webp"
        media="(max-width: 800px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/whois-2_hu_517902df11c2270b.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/whois-2_hu_9fe55b76698f615.webp"
      width="1057" height="255" alt="ICANN domain lookup for studentloanrepayment.co.uk" loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Screenshot by the author</p>
</div>
</p>
<p>DNExperts&rsquo; own site is currently empty, but when it previously had content (in <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20240205153440/https://www.dnexperts.com/">February 2024</a>) they linked to the GoDaddy-owned Dan.com (now Afternic).</p>
<p>Greenhalgh lists a Polish phone number, but otherwise has no online presence that I could uncover. The Potshot site first appears in <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230720102823/https://potshot.co.uk/">July 2023</a> (and it didn&rsquo;t work then either). Another site for which he serves as registrar (<code>purefx.co.uk</code>) is a foreign exchange brokerage, so he seems to have something of a line in dodgy financial clients.</p>
<p>Let&rsquo;s return to the domain-squatting payday loan company. On their own domain, they actually <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20070317232103/http://www.wagedayadvance.co.uk/">date all the way back to Mar 2007</a>. In 2012 <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20120311082841/http://wagedayadvance.co.uk/terms-and-conditions.aspx#leftpanel:~:text=Wagedayadvance%2Eco%2Euk%20is%20a%20site%20operated,also%20Our%20main%20trading%20address">they referenced CURO Translantic Limited</a> (company № 04179322), incorporated in 2001 and <a href="https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/04179322">dissolved in 2021</a>. As of 2018 the site declared that they were <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180504105704/https://www.wagedayadvance.co.uk/#footer:~:text=FCA%20Permission%20No:%20672831">authorised by the <abbr title="Financial Conduct Authority">FCA</abbr></a> (<a href="https://register.fca.org.uk/s/firm?id=001b000000kfxrWAAQ">register № 672831</a>), but they were deauthorised upon their dissolution in 2021.</p>
<p>Between 2019 and 2020 the company were <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20200506211905/http://www.wagedayadvance.co.uk/">under administration</a>, with their assets being bought by another company that seem to have had no ongoing relationship with the brand. Wage Day Advance Limited (<a href="https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13115670">company № 13115670</a>) was then incorporated as a new company (with a Portuguese woman listed as its sole officer, who was not previously an officer for CURO Transatlantic), and lasted until 2025 when they were voluntarily struck off. The new company served as <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20240501041324/https://www.wagedayadvance.co.uk/#footer-terms:~:text=WageDayAdvance%2Eco%2Euk%20is%20a%20registered%20trading,Office%20under%20registration%20number:%20ZB150261">whatever an <q
  itemscope
  itemtype="Quotation">Introducer Appointed Representative</q> is</a> for another company called T Dot UK Limited (<a href="https://register.fca.org.uk/s/firm?id=001b000000nTSeeAAG"><abbr title="Financial Conduct Authority">FCA</abbr> register № 688026</a>, <a href="https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09225672">company № 09225672</a>); they appear to <a href="https://t.uk/">run an affiliate network</a> for targetted selling of advertisement. They trade under 45 different names, and the <abbr title="Financial Conduct Authority">FCA</abbr> register warns that they may be part of a scam:</p>
<p>


<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/tdot-1_hu_f432a86d60ed1ee0.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/tdot-1_hu_776423e876a410bd.webp"
        media="(max-width: 800px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/tdot-1_hu_44caae5d52645f8b.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/tdot-1_hu_776423e876a410bd.webp"
      width="892" height="853" alt="Trading names for T Dot UK Limited" loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Screenshot by the author</p>
</div>




<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/tdot-2_hu_330deee6f13fb27f.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/tdot-2_hu_5377e4f0d49021b5.webp"
        media="(max-width: 1200px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/tdot-2_hu_45385d8f392e8cc2.webp"
        media="(max-width: 800px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/tdot-2_hu_8599fc8397beefba.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/why-did-hmrc-send-me-to-a-payday-loan-company/images/tdot-2_hu_5377e4f0d49021b5.webp"
      width="1298" height="568" alt="&lt;abbr title=&#34;Financial Conduct Authority&#34;&gt;FCA&lt;/abbr&gt; warning about clones of T Dot UK Limited" loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Screenshot by the author</p>
</div>
</p>
<p>In August 2024, the <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20240801131916/https://www.wagedayadvance.co.uk/">site went down</a>, and when it came back online in October they were <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20241002055537/https://wagedayadvance.co.uk/#footer-terms:~:text=WageDayAdvance%2Eco%2Euk%20is%20a%20registered%20trading,Hull%2C%20United%20Kingdom%2C%20HU1%201QE%2E">now owned by a new company</a> called Chojin Ltd (<a href="https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/07339611">company № 07339611</a>, <a href="https://register.fca.org.uk/s/firm?id=001b000003F6QWDAA3"><abbr title="Financial Conduct Authority">FCA</abbr> register № 732880</a>), incorporated in 2010 and again with a completely different set of officers. The <abbr title="Financial Conduct Authority">FCA</abbr> register shows them using 7 trading names, and includes the same warning about clones. Intriguingly, the Web site provided for them on the <abbr title="Financial Conduct Authority">FCA</abbr> register is <code>readies.co.uk</code>, which currently also redirects to WageDayAdvance (but which, until July 2023, <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230726150417/https://www.readies.co.uk/">was its own site</a>). The email address on the <abbr title="Financial Conduct Authority">FCA</abbr> register is <code>scott@readies.co.uk</code>, and Companies House shows that Chojin Ltd&rsquo;s sole officer shares that first name.</p>
<p>So, in sum, it seems that <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> outsourced management of their domain to a third party, who forgot to renew the registration following their acquisition (or perhaps <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> ended the contract). For the last year and a half or so, the domain has been squatted by a sketchy payday loan company. The company has repeatedly traded hands, including affiliation with two separate <abbr title="Financial Conduct Authority">FCA</abbr>-registered companies, both of which seem to primarily operate within this parasitic industry and for both of which the <abbr title="Financial Conduct Authority">FCA</abbr> has posted possible scam warnings. And lastly, the sole director of Chojin Ltd seems to be directly tied to the decision to domain-squat this formerly government-owned <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="Uniform Resource Locator">URL</abbr> in order to catch unwary loanholders. Either <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> have no idea that any of this is the case, or they know and have not notified <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr>, who have also not checked and who continue to direct people to the site.</p>
<div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes">
<hr>
<ol>
<li id="fn:1">
<p><code>studentloansrepayment.co.uk</code> (with &rsquo;s&rsquo; after &rsquo;loan&rsquo;) does the same, whilst <a href="https://www.studentloanrepayments.co.uk/"><code>studentloanrepayments.co.uk</code></a> (with &rsquo;s&rsquo; after &lsquo;repayment&rsquo;) leads to a student loan repayment calculator, but it does not seem to be at all affiliated with the government; in fact, I can&rsquo;t find any information on who is behind it, but it doesn&rsquo;t <em>seem</em> to be doing anything untoward.&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Come, Mister Tally Man</title>
      <link>https://bengoldsworthy.net/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/</link>
      <category>Reports</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 00:58:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>me&#43;bgrss@bengoldsworthy.net (Ben Goldsworthy)</author>
      <guid>https://bengoldsworthy.net/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/</guid>
      <description>Fuck the British tax system. And the student loan system too, whilst I&amp;rsquo;m at it.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the previous <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> financial year (2024&ndash;25), I earnt the princely sum of £9,500 in <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr>-taxable income (due, in no small part, to moving abroad in the summer). This was to be all covered by my Personal Allowance of £12,500-ish per year, and so my total taxable amount should have been nil.</p>
<p>So why&mdash;<em>the fuck</em>&mdash;did I just have to lend the taxman seven thousand pounds?</p>
<aside class="note"><p>&lsquo;Just get an accountant&rsquo;, you say? Never!</p>
<p>I figured out how to file my <abbr
class="abbr"
title="United States">US</abbr> taxes on my own, and only <em>once</em> did I accidentally claim to have made several thousands of dollars in agricultural losses. Some masochistic part of me enjoys the puzzle-like element of trying to figure out how it all works. Plus, I feel on principle (as with law) that no taxation system should be beyond the ken of any sufficiently motivated subject.</p>
<p>Also, as we shall see, I think a good chunk of the bill would have been unavoidable even with an accountant&rsquo;s assistance.</p>
</aside>

<h2 id="square-peg-round-holes" class="subheading">
  Square Peg, Round Holes
  <a class="heading-anchor" href="#square-peg-round-holes">¶</a>
</h2>
<p>The <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> is a deeply silly country, in ways that I find increasingly aggravating the longer I live outside of it and realise just how <em>optional</em> it all is.</p>
<p>For example, to explain why our tax calendar runs from April 6 to April 5 would require a discussion on the vagaries of a calendar change 500 years ago&mdash;this is <a href="https://theconversation.com/why-the-uk-tax-year-begins-on-april-6-its-a-very-strange-tale-57247">literally not a joke</a>, but the insistence on continuing on in this manner can only be described as self-harm.<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1</a></sup> The end result is that, having now moved to a far more sensible and thoroughly metric sort of country with a tax year aligned to the calendar year, I am left trying calculate my figures between three disjoint periods: the 2024&ndash;25 <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> tax year; the 2024 French tax year; and the 2025 French tax year (which I don&rsquo;t even have final figures for, and won&rsquo;t do so until around August).</p>
<p>On top of that, I am having to learn an entirely new tax system (my third!) from scratch, in a language I can only somewhat read, in a <a href="https://www.frenchentree.com/living-in-france/french-tax/france-tax-calendar-key-dates/#:~:text=your%20tax%20bills%29%2E-,April%2010th%2C%202025:%20Income%20Tax,you%20within%20a%20few%20months%2E,-May%2022rd%2C%202025">very short one-month window</a>. Because this is my first French return, and because I need to tell the <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> authorities that I&rsquo;m moving abroad, both returns need to be written out by hand and submitted by post.</p>
<p>Let me repeat that, as foreshadowing for the level of bullshit to come: <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> require me to physically <em>post</em> them a letter to tell them that I&rsquo;m no longer in the country.</p>
<p>Anyway, I cracked on, deciphering page after page of cryptic French tax guidance and learning about all manner of different forms (at least twice discovering a completely new and utterly crucial one when I thought I was done which changed everything and made me start again from scratch).<sup id="fnref:2"><a href="#fn:2" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">2</a></sup> The <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> forms I was a little more familiar with, although only through the online tool prior to now, and I gradually pulled everything together. &lsquo;<abbr title="Statuatory Residence Test">SRT</abbr>&rsquo;, &lsquo;<abbr title="Dual Taxation Agreement">DTA</abbr>s&rsquo;, &lsquo;Schumacher non-residency&rsquo;: just some of the new concepts I had to wrap my head around, for having had the temerity to live a slightly abnormal life.</p>
<p>I dotted all my &lsquo;i&rsquo;s, crossed all my &rsquo;t&rsquo;s and sent off my French return in May, and then my <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> return whilst visiting in June, along with requests to both countries&rsquo; tax authorities for proof of residency.</p>
<p>In the end, despite moving to France full-time in May and getting my <i lang="fr" title="residence permit">titre de sejour</i> in July, because of my frequent trips back to the <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> (with 131 days to France&rsquo;s 235, across 4 separate visits) I was ineligible for <a href="https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/residence-and-fig-regime-manual/rfig21010">split-year treatment</a> and instead had to dig down into the <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/france-tax-treaties"><abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr>&ndash;France Dual Taxation Agreement (<abbr>DTA</abbr>)</a>, eventually deciding that because every prior test was inconclusive, I would just have to <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/france-tax-treaties/synthesised-text-of-the-multilateral-instrument-and-the-2008-uk-france-double-taxation-convention-in-force#article-4-residence:~:text=%28c%29%20if%20he%20has%20an%20habitual%20abode%20in%20both%20Contracting%20States%20or%20in%20neither%20of%20them%2C%20he%20shall%20be%20deemed%20to%20be%20a%20resident%20only%20of%20the%20State%20of%20which%20he%20is%20a%20national%3B">break the tie by nationality</a> for this year and remain <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> tax-resident (but still enjoy all of the French tax breaks&mdash;that&rsquo;s that Schumacher residency magic, baby!).</p>
<p>As I made clear to <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr>, though, most of my figures would be provisional until later that year, and the final quarter will remain provisional until later this year; also, that my lingering <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> tax residency in 2024&ndash;25 was a fluke and would not be the case in the following year.</p>
<h2 id="mistakes-were-made" class="subheading">
  Mistakes Were Made
  <a class="heading-anchor" href="#mistakes-were-made">¶</a>
</h2>
<p>At the start of October, I received my French tax statement for 2024: <i lang="fr" title="nothing to pay">rien à payer</i> (as expected, since all my pay had been taxed at source). Later in the month, I received my <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> tax statement: £6,840.10 due by January 31<sup>st</sup>, with an additional £1,505.70 due by the end of the following July.</p>
<p><em>Welp.</em></p>
<p>Suffice it to say, this was rather steeper than the <em>zero</em> pounds I had been expecting, so I got back to work: checking my now-final French payslips; cross-referencing figures; converting between currencies; and re-reading all the guidance. I realised that I had overstated my taxable foreign income by about £7,000 (because I had just used the gross income figure), and I understated my foreign tax already paid by about £2,500 (because France has six different types of deduction that <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/france-tax-treaties/synthesised-text-of-the-multilateral-instrument-and-the-2008-uk-france-double-taxation-convention-in-force#article-2-taxes-covered:~:text=United%20Kingdom%20tax%E2%80%99%29%3B-,%28b%29%20in%20the%20case%20of,referred%20to%20as%20%E2%80%98French%20tax%E2%80%99%29%2E,-2%2E%20This%20Convention">all count as income tax</a> under the <abbr title="Dual Taxation Agreement">DTA</abbr>).<sup id="fnref:3"><a href="#fn:3" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">3</a></sup></p>
<p>Not to worry: I had already told <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> the figures were provisional, so presumably I&rsquo;d be at the front of the queue for processing updates when I finally received my real numbers. I figured I&rsquo;d just send in an amended return and that it&rsquo;d all get sorted before the end of January, and so I posted the amended return (recorded delivery, of course) at the end of November, during another visit back, and didn&rsquo;t think much more about it.</p>
<p>And for good measure, I included another reminder that in the 2025&ndash;26 tax year, I would be fully France-resident.</p>
<h2 id="royal-fail" class="subheading">
  Royal Fail
  <a class="heading-anchor" href="#royal-fail">¶</a>
</h2>
<p>Time passed and, after recovering from my new year&rsquo;s celebrations,<sup id="fnref:4"><a href="#fn:4" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">4</a></sup> I remembered about the looming end-of-January payment deadline and realised I hadn&rsquo;t heard anything back from <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> yet. I took a look at the <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> online portal, and they were still asking for both the arm <em>and</em> the leg. <em>Hmm…</em></p>
<p>I still had my postage receipt, so I plugged the reference number into the Royal Mail tracker, only to find that my amended return had been seemingly abandoned in a Wolverhampton Delivery Office a month earlier:</p>



<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/royal-mail-screenshot_hu_2d97472becf38961.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/royal-mail-screenshot_hu_8ccc66490b90361a.webp"
        media="(max-width: 1200px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/royal-mail-screenshot_hu_18e8537d02bcca62.webp"
        media="(max-width: 800px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/royal-mail-screenshot_hu_a8a08ef5a4baa5f6.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/royal-mail-screenshot_hu_8ccc66490b90361a.webp"
      width="1230" height="561" alt="Royal Mail delivery tracker, showing that the delivery arrived at a Wolverhampton Delivery Office at the end of November" loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Screenshot by the author</p>
</div>

<aside class="note"><p>Let&rsquo;s take a brief detour so that I may describe Royal Mail to you. Like so much of this story, its failings function as a fine example of contemporary Britain in microcosm.</p>
<p>Based on the name, the coronal branding and the postal service&rsquo;s crucial role in any functioning society, you may well think that Royal Mail is a government agency. Once upon a time (<abbr
class="abbr"
title="id est [that is]" lang="la">i.e.</abbr>, for most of the past 500 years), you would have been correct.</p>
<p>However, during the early 2010s, as part of the government&rsquo;s campaign of national asset-stripping, it was privatised&mdash;the shares sold for a song, with <a href="https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn06668/#:~:text=It%20is%20clear%20that%20the%20Government%20met%20its%20objectives%20in%20terms%20of%20delivering%20a%20privatised%20Royal%20Mail%2E%20However%2C%20it%20is%20not%20clear%20whether%20value%20for%20money%20was%20achieved%3B%20it%20appears%20that%20the%20taxpayer%20has%20missed%20out%20on%20significant%20value%2E">a subsequent commitee report</a> concluding that <q
itemscope
itemtype="Quotation">it is clear that the Government met its objectives in terms of delivering a privatised Royal Mail [but] it appears that the taxpayer has missed out on significant value.</q></p>
<p>As of 2024, it is owned by a Czech billionaire.</p>
</aside>

<p>I searched around for how to <a href="https://help.royalmail.com/personal/s/">contact Royal Mail support</a>, to ask them what on earth they had done with my <em>very important tax documents</em>. This led me on several fruitless loops as I was unable to find any obvious asynchronous way to contact them:</p>


<video
    class="u-video figure__video"
    controls
    itemprop="video"
    preload="none"
    src="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/videos/royal-mail-support.webm"
    poster=""
>
    Your browser doesn't support embedded video, <a href="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/videos/royal-mail-support.webm">view the video here</a>.
</video>

<p>I gave in, and tried to call a couple of the numbers I had alighted upon on separate journeys through the support page maze. Across six attempts, four automatically hung up on me and the other two had me on hold for thirty minutes apiece before I gave up. I searched online for contact details, which was where I discovered <a href="https://duckduckgo.com/?q=contact+royal+mail+site%3Areddit.com">a flood of <cite
      class="cite"
      itemscope itemprop="citation" itemtype="https://schema.org/WebSite"><meta itemprop="url" content="https://reddit.com"><span itemprop="name">Reddit</span></cite> threads</a> of people facing the same problems:</p>



<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/royal-mail-reddit_hu_d124cf2d5bdf0ad9.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/royal-mail-reddit_hu_ae206956eac1e935.webp"
        media="(max-width: 800px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/royal-mail-reddit_hu_f3581ee715735da.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/royal-mail-reddit_hu_ae206956eac1e935.webp"
      width="851" height="903" alt="Search engine results for a search of &#34;contact royal mail site:reddit.com&#34;, showing many results" loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Screenshot by the author</p>
</div>

<p>In between what I can only describe as &lsquo;<a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/royalmail/comments/zql9dv/comment/j0yssy9/?context=3">telephone</a> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/royalmail/comments/15i30hk/comment/kciawvk/">numerology</a>&rsquo; and the appearance of one apparent <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/royalmail/comments/1lbp0l7/comment/nns5ny9/">Mail customer service representative</a>, I finally found <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/royalmail/comments/11ayb0r/comment/mtn2grn/?context=3">an unpublished customer support email address</a> and submitted my enquiry; I received an automated reply saying they would try to get back to my within seven days.</p>
<h2 id="no-good-options" class="subheading">
  No Good Options
  <a class="heading-anchor" href="#no-good-options">¶</a>
</h2>
<p>In the meantime, I tried chewing the sausage from the other end and called <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr>. After an absolutely interminable slog through the automated chatbot and endless pre-recorded messages&mdash;with the end-of-January deadline looming, they <em>really</em> want everyone to know that if it&rsquo;s not urgent they should come back in February&mdash;I actually got talking to someone surprisingly quickly. She confirmed that they had received the amended return (Great! I don&rsquo;t need to interact with Royal Mail any more!), and that it was currently forecast to be processed in *tapatapatapatap* <em>November</em>.</p>
<p>(The astute reader shall, at this juncture, no doubt recognise that this is a <em>ridiculous</em> delay for processing an amendment <em>of which they had been prewarned</em>, and also <em>absolutely no fucking use to me right now</em>.)</p>
<p>She clearly had my amended return up on her computer screen as she referred to figures in it. So <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> <em>had</em> my updated return, and it <em>knew</em> it had my updated return, but it wouldn&rsquo;t <em>officially</em> know that it knew for the best part of a year, by which point it would have robbed me of the best part of ten grand that both it, and I, knew it would end up giving back to me anyway.</p>
<p>In light of this incredibly stupid situation, I asked the support agent how I could pay the minimal amount to avoid any penalties whilst I waited for their team of highly-trained sloths to finally get around to fixing my bill (obviously, not quite in those terms). I <em>could</em> set up a payment plan, but I would <a href="current-late-payment-and-repayment-interest-rates">accrue interest</a> on my outstanding balance that I would still have to pay off <em>even after the balance from which the interest arose was nullified</em> (as we both knew it would be). Even though the interest is non-compounding, I would still be looking at an additional £530. So, not an option.</p>
<p>This left me with only one course of action: come up with the cash by the end of January (which was, at this point, a few weeks away). That&rsquo;s not exactly the kind of sum one carries around in their back pocket, but I was eventually able to sell off enough shares in my long-term savings to cover it.<sup id="fnref:5"><a href="#fn:5" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">5</a></sup></p>
<p>I fully appreciate that I am in a very fortunate financial position here,<sup id="fnref:6"><a href="#fn:6" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">6</a></sup> which just makes the phenomenal unnecessariness of this situation so frustrating: I&rsquo;m sure many people, faced with a bill like this, would have to choose between either a) paying a £530 premium for the crime of poverty or b) taking out a loan, with all of the dangers of taking on such debt, which will persist long after the initial balance is all resolved.</p>
<h2 id="fuck-the-british-tax-system-and-the-student-loan-system-too-whilst-im-at-it" class="subheading">
  Fuck the British Tax System. And the Student Loan System Too, Whilst I&rsquo;m at It.
  <a class="heading-anchor" href="#fuck-the-british-tax-system-and-the-student-loan-system-too-whilst-im-at-it">¶</a>
</h2>
<p>Whilst I was (increasingly nervously) waiting to get access to my cash, I decided to take a closer look at the tax calculation to try and figure out how the bill&mdash;even accounting for my erroneous figures&mdash;had ended up so sizeable. At which point, something jumped out at me:</p>



<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/income-tax-calculation_hu_84dcd49db8899441.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/income-tax-calculation_hu_968f255510af3de4.webp"
        media="(max-width: 800px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/income-tax-calculation_hu_91868a92806a931d.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/income-tax-calculation_hu_968f255510af3de4.webp"
      width="1038" height="145" alt="Tax calculation showing £5,539.40 in Income Tax, minus £2,528.00 in Foreign Tax Credit Relief, resulting in a final figure of £3,011.40" loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Photo by the author</p>
</div>

<p>Even with my wrong figures, I was only due to pay a few grand of tax. So why was I now looking at paying well over twice that? Well, just below the above calculation, was this one:</p>



<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/income-tax-loans_hu_426b43ab2b8c0e11.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/income-tax-loans_hu_5fe547935ef67e28.webp"
        media="(max-width: 800px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/income-tax-loans_hu_320fa87635369807.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/income-tax-loans_hu_5fe547935ef67e28.webp"
      width="1029" height="126" alt="Tax calculation showing £1,167.00 and £1,156.00 in student loan repayments, resulting in a final Income Tax figure of £5,334.40" loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Photo by the author</p>
<div class="figure__caption"><p class="figcaption__caption">Cuntsssssssssssssssssss…</p></div></div>

<aside class="note"><p>Time for another aside, because the way student loans work in the <abbr
class="abbr"
title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> is also incredibly stupid.</p>
<p>Between 2012&ndash;22, university tuition fees more than tripled and student loans were offered with <a href="https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/students/student-loans-tuition-fees-changes/">the following terms</a>: they would not be subject to debt collection or defaulting; they would have no impact on one&rsquo;s credit rating; recipients would only repay at a rate of 9% of their earnings over £27,000<abbr
class="abbr"
title="per year">/yr</abbr> (with the <a href="https://www.savethestudent.org/student-jobs/whats-the-expected-salary-for-your-degree.html">average <abbr
class="abbr"
title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> graduate salary</a> being £38,500, with a range between £16,000 and £90,000); and as long as there were no arrears, the debt would be wiped after 30 years.</p>
<p>The idea was that having more graduates was a good thing, but this was in the midst of the post-2008 austerity hysteria so the government couldn&rsquo;t be seen to just be paying to subsidise higher education. Thus, the dumbest possible solution was devised, such that all the money given out as &lsquo;student loans&rsquo; could be recorded on the government&rsquo;s balance sheets as loans that would one day be repaid (<abbr
class="abbr"
title="id est [that is]" lang="la">i.e.</abbr>, not as an expense, but an asset).</p>
<p>The government has on several occasions <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Student_Loans_Company#Student_loan_book_sales">sold tranches of loans</a> to private investors for <a href="https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8348/#:~:text=This%20represented%20a%20write%20off%20of%2051%20per%20cent%20of%20the%20face%20value%20of%20the%20loans%2E">51% of their face value</a>. Ingeniously, the Student Loans Company (<abbr>SLC</abbr>)&mdash;the government body responsible for chasing loan repayments&mdash;would remain responsible for the administration of the loan recovery, but the repayments would be forwarded on to the the investors. However, as vampirically wasteful as that is for the country, for the loanholder it would actually be an improvement, as the government is (astonishingly) allowed to retroactively change the terms of the student loans it still owns, but when they are sold they appear to be subject to normal contract rules and become immutable.</p>
<p>The government had sold their way up to 2012 (and so, presumably, my 2014 and 2017 loans would have been next on the auction block) before the Office for National Statistics (ONS) <a href="https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/governmentpublicsectorandtaxes/publicsectorfinance/articles/newtreatmentofstudentloansinthepublicsectorfinancesandnationalaccounts/2018-12-17">declared that they were reassessing</a> how they accounted for student loans on the government balance sheet, and that they would in fact now be considered (partly) as expenditure, thus invalidating the core conceit of the whole process; the government announced that there would be <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-the-student-loan-sale-programme#:~:text=Due%20to%20the%20government%27s%20progress,are%20unaffected%20by%20this%20decision.">no further sales</a>.</p>
<p>The <abbr>SLC</abbr> is a government body with a staff of 3,000, and <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/slc-annual-business-plan-2025-26/slc-annual-business-plan-2025-26#managing-public-money-1">has received £321.1<abbr
class="abbr"
title="million">m</abbr> in funding</a> in this financial year. All to administer, poorly, a scheme for which the original rationale is now moot.</p>
<p>One can voluntarily make additional repayments, but there is no benefit to doing so because there is <a href="https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/students/repay-post-2012-student-loan/">no downside to having the debt</a>. The interest gained (which is comparatively high) results in the balance usually increasing faster than most people are paying it off (even <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/c70lg3xlw87o">doctors</a>). The government has in the past <a href="https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/2015/11/autumn-statement-2015-hidden-retrospective-hike-in-student-loans-repayments-a-disgrace/">backed off on highly controversial plans</a> for retroactive changes to the repayment thresholds, although in 2022 they did <a href="https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/2022/02/plan-2-students-to-pay-p8-000-more-of-their-student-loan-as-gov-/">retroactively <em>freeze</em> the repayment thresholds for three years</a> (which had until then been rising with inflation) and <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce3k4xdqyp1o">they&rsquo;ve announced that they&rsquo;ll be doing so again</a> from next year.</p>
<p>The end result of all this is that in 2042, a good amount of the first tranche of these loans will be cancelled, leaving a huge hole in the government budget. By that point, the total value of student loan debt is <a href="https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01079/">forecast to be £500<abbr
class="abbr"
title="billion">bn</abbr></a>&mdash;for comparison, <abbr
class="abbr"
title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> annual spending on defence is ~£55<abbr
class="abbr"
title="billion">bn</abbr> and healthcare is ~£180<abbr
class="abbr"
title="billion">bn</abbr>. It&rsquo;s estimated that <a href="https://fullfact.org/education/about-17-students-are-forecast-fully-pay-back-their-loans/">over 80% of loans will never be fully repaid</a>.</p>
<p>My own loans are due to cancel later that same decade (provided there are no retroactive changes, which <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/1fr5e9g/student_loans_is_it_probable_that_they_will_be/">I think is probably unlikely</a>). I initially took out £34,500, and by my reckoning I have paid off around £5,700. My current balance is £63,340 after 8 years of repayment; last year, even at the higher French repayment rate and earning a decent salary, I still paid less than I gained in interest:</p>
  <div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">
<p><picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/student-loan-interest_hu_7bcdaa8a034adfb8.webp" /><source
srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/student-loan-interest_hu_f2efdf1b8d9e4543.webp"
media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
/>
<img
class="u-photo picture__image"
src="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/student-loan-interest_hu_7bcdaa8a034adfb8.webp"
width="613" height="611" alt="Student loan repayments showing £0.00 in automatic salary repayments, £1,170.00 in overseas direct repayments and £1,774.26 in accrued interest" loading="lazy"/>
</picture></p>
  <p class="attr">Screenshot by the author</p>
  </div>
</aside>

<p>But wait: I had dutifully informed the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> when I moved abroad, and had set up a Direct Debit to make my monthly repayments. <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> and the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> are both government agencies, and when you work in the <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> your loan repayments are automatically deducted from your payroll each month, so they clearly talk to each other. So why were they now double-charging me?</p>
<p>After some digging, I found this small note buried in <a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/tell-hmrc-about-a-student-loan-in-your-tax-return#overseas-direct-debit-payments:~:text=and%20box%203.-,Overseas%20Direct%20Debit%20payments,amount%20of%20tax%20you%20owe.,-Voluntary%20payments">one of their help pages</a> (emphasis mine):</p>



<blockquote
    class="blockquote__body"cite="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/tell-hmrc-about-a-student-loan-in-your-tax-return#overseas-direct-debit-payments:~:text=and%20box%203.-,Overseas%20Direct%20Debit%20payments,amount%20of%20tax%20you%20owe.,-Voluntary%20payments"><h3 id="overseas-direct-debit-payments" class="subsubheading">
  Overseas Direct Debit payments
  <a class="heading-anchor" href="#overseas-direct-debit-payments">¶</a>
</h3>
<p>If you have been paying Direct Debit payments to the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> while you have been abroad your tax return will need to include your total income.</p>
<p>Your student loan repayments will be calculated on this total income, but will not take into account the Direct Debit payments you have already made to the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr>.</p>
<p><strong>After you send your tax return, contact the Student Loan Company and they will tell <abbr
class="abbr"
title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> how much you have paid.</strong></p>
<p><abbr
class="abbr"
title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> then uses this figure to reduce the amount of tax you owe.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So despite being but two cheeks of the same arse, and despite information normally flowing bidirectionally and automatically between the two bodies, in this <em>one</em> specific case I have to (for some reason, unstated) contact the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> to tell them to tell <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> that I&rsquo;ve been paying my loan off.</p>
<p>I called <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr>. Another fucking phone maze. More waiting to the sound of classicial music through tinny mobile phone speakers. Another friendly enough support agent, forced to bear the brunt of my wholly justified frustration. She said she had passed on my request to their <q
  itemscope
  itemtype="Quotation">backoffice team</q>, and it would be processed <q
  itemscope
  itemtype="Quotation">in five working days</q>. Fuck off.</p>
<h2 id="one-final-robbery" class="subheading">
  One Final Robbery
  <a class="heading-anchor" href="#one-final-robbery">¶</a>
</h2>
<p>The eagle-eyed reader will have noticed a £3,000-ish difference between the numbers I was being asked to pay, and the Income Tax that had been calculated. For this final piece of the puzzle, I had to dig a bit into the letter, where I found this:</p>



<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/income-tax-prediction_hu_eb84c9bf33faaa82.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/income-tax-prediction_hu_9e6aeb68427093bd.webp"
        media="(max-width: 800px)"
      /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/income-tax-prediction_hu_5b591685fab7f07a.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/income-tax-prediction_hu_9e6aeb68427093bd.webp"
      width="986" height="170" alt="Tax calculation showing an estimate 2025--26 tax bill of £3,011.40, to be paid in two instalments of £1,505.70." loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Photo by the author</p>
</div>

<p>So despite me having <em>repeatedly</em> told them that this year was a one-off, and that I would be fully tax-resident in France next time with no tax obligations in the <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr>, these loveless jizztrumpets decided that what I <em>meant</em> to say was that I would in fact owe them another three grand in the next tax year, and would be happy to pay it in two instalments.</p>
<p>I have submitted <a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/claim-to-reduce-payments-on-account">a separate claim</a> to reduce the predicted payments, but who knows how long it will be before anybody gets around to reviewing it.</p>
<h2 id="conclusion" class="subheading">
  Conclusion
  <a class="heading-anchor" href="#conclusion">¶</a>
</h2>
<p>I managed to pay my January bill with one day remaining. I was initially going to hold back the July instalment until the last moment in the hopes that the typewriter monkeys might manage to process my amendment before then, but now I think I&rsquo;ll pay it off immediately&mdash;I just learnt that <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> will pay you back <em>with interest</em> for early overpayment, and even though the interest rate is probably worse than I could get by just reinvesting the money, the small justice of squeezing it out of these fuckwits has an irresistable appeal.</p>
<p>I now have three separate claims in progress to try and regularise my bill:</p>
<ul>
<li>the amended tax return for <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> tax year 2024&ndash;25
<ul>
<li>Goal: reduce my 2024&ndash;25 Income Tax due after tax reductions from £3,011.40 to as little as possible</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>the request to the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> for them to tell <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> that I&rsquo;ve double-paid for my loan repayments
<ul>
<li>Goal: reduce my 2024&ndash;25 student loan repayments due from £2,323 to £0</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>the restatement to <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="His Majesty&#39;s Revenue &amp; Custom">HMRC</abbr> that I will owe them jack shit in <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr> tax year 2025&ndash;26 (or ever after)
<ul>
<li>Goal: reduce my predicted 2025&ndash;26 Income Tax due from £3,011.40 to £0</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>I have been reassessing my relationship with my homeland, and this experience could not have come at a more febrile moment for me. I&rsquo;m working on several (much longer) pieces that will delve deep into the details, but suffice it to say here that I have come to detest this wretched isle and all that it stands for; unfortunately, even a failing government tends to retain its ability to exort money until the very last.</p>
<p>It is impossible, however, to have a seven-grand hole blown out of your budget through a combination of bureaucratic incomprehensibility, unreasonable wait times and the lumbering administrative remnants of a failed attempt by a government long past to scam <em>itself</em> at the expense of future governments and future generations (and <em>I&rsquo;m not even talking about Brexit</em>!). Those three things are the perfect trifecta of the contemporary British experience, and I want no more part in it.</p>
<p>On top of all that, by doing the quote-unquote &lsquo;right thing&rsquo; and diligently making my loan repayments from overseas, I am in fact paying <em>another</em> premium due to <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/UKPersonalFinance/comments/1cx4hni/drastic_change_to_overseas_france_repayment/lmm81p5/">the absurd figures</a> used by the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> to calculate overseas rates.<sup id="fnref:7"><a href="#fn:7" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">7</a></sup> As luck would have it, the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> has historically shown <a href="https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/jobs/schools-universities/not-coming-back-britain-70000-expat-dodge-student-loans/#:~:text=Severe%20financial%20penalties%20are%20failing,debts%20or%20seek%20court%20orders%2E">neither the appetite nor the capability</a> for <a href="https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2016/06/how-are-graduates-who-move-abroad-getting-away-not-paying-their-student">chasing non-paying overseas graduates</a>, and the only potential downside to non-payment is the accrual of punitive arrears which will have to be repaid if one ever returns to work in the <abbr
          class="abbr"
          title="United Kingdom">UK</abbr>; I think I would rather take a bath with my toaster. Although, of course, until and unless they decide to sell my loan, I will remain at the mercy of every subsequent government&rsquo;s change of heart on this and all other terms of the loan. For now&mdash;whilst I value keeping my options open over an urgent need to save cash&mdash;I will keep up my repayments, but I have twenty more years of this to go and as soon as the egregiousness of <em>actual</em> present-day fuckery outweighs the risk of <em>potential</em> future fuckery, it&rsquo;s reassuring to know that there is a big wide world out there to disappear into.</p>
<p>So, as I call time on my twenties and prepare to embark on my thirties with newfound and hard-won wisdom and sagacity, I&rsquo;m finally starting&mdash;unhappily&mdash;to internalise the principal lesson that Britain has been teaching me all my life: only a sucker plays by the rules.</p>
<p>May I have fewest possible future dealings with any of these robbing bastards, or the rock they call home, for as long as I live.</p>
<h2 id="addendum" class="subheading">
  Addendum
  <a class="heading-anchor" href="#addendum">¶</a>
</h2>
<p>Astonishingly, immediately after publishing this article the <abbr title="Student Loans Company">SLC</abbr> began to spam me, alternately requesting me to make start repayments and provide customer feedback:</p>



<div class="picture__wrapper" role="group">



<picture class="picture " itemprop="image"><source srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/slc-emails_hu_7932ddf930cc257.webp" /><source
        srcset="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/slc-emails_hu_a4d458e4ccdb0e5.webp"
        media="(max-width: 500px) or (prefers-reduced-data: reduce)"
      />
  <img
    class="u-photo picture__image"
      src="/blog/posts/come-mister-tally-man/images/slc-emails_hu_7932ddf930cc257.webp"
      width="752" height="316" alt="A series of emails from the SLC, alternately asking to complete a feedback survey and to make repayments." loading="lazy"/>
</picture>




<p class="attr">Screenshot by the author</p>
</div>

<p>Please excuse me whilst I go and prepare a thousand photocopies of my arse.</p>
<div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes">
<hr>
<ol>
<li id="fn:1">
<p>Ireland was once in the same boat as us, until the <abbr title="Irish Republican Army">IRA</abbr> heroically fought for (and won) the <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110504010808/http://www.finance.gov.ie/viewdoc.asp?DocID=1467">right to a reasonable tax year</a> (amongst, I think, some other things).&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
<li id="fn:2">
<p>Despite the faff, there <em>are</em> a few things I quite like about the French system: you get tax credit for union dues, for one; and a very generous 60% credit for charitable donations.&#160;<a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
<li id="fn:3">
<p>I accept that this is where an accountant with cross-Channel expertise would have been handy.&#160;<a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
<li id="fn:4">
<p>Actually, this was probably the first year I&rsquo;ve begun <em>without</em> a hangover in as long as I can remember. I had a very wholesome night. I cooked a bouillebaisse for some friends and we danced some salsa.&#160;<a href="#fnref:4" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
<li id="fn:5">
<p>This actually brought its own sweatiness, as my Jan 23 request to sell didn&rsquo;t actually go through until <em>Jan 29</em>.&#160;<a href="#fnref:5" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
<li id="fn:6">
<p>In fact, <a href="https://wilsoniumite.com/2026/01/27/surely-it-has-to-be-soon/">if the economy crashes</a> between now and me reinvesting the money when I get it back, I may actually stand to make a tidy profit with this enforced trading.&#160;<a href="#fnref:6" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
<li id="fn:7">
<p>Actually&mdash;I had forgotten until just now&mdash;the fuckers also tried to slap me with £600 in &lsquo;arrears&rsquo; when I got back from Central America, despite me having told them my travel dates and that I would have had no income. Another time, they demanded three months of unredacted bank statements to provide <q
  itemscope
  itemtype="Quotation">evidence of your financial means of support</q>; I sent them three for an account that I used for no transactions other than receiving money and immediately forwarding on, and they accepted that.&#160;<a href="#fnref:7" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>

