Comments

## Comments ### Comment by Merryn on 2022-01-07 08:03:47 +0000 Colourful, high-level aspirations – I’m wondering if the arguments might be animated by adding a discussion point: how do we articulate them at a lower level, to motivate the people **in** this New Model Army? To stay – to join, even – to see the higher purpose as attainable? (Twitter comment) ### Comment by Howard Canitbe on 2022-01-11 07:25:37 +0000 Climate change is not, has never been, and will never be a primary driver of international conflict and framing illegal immigration as a purely humanitarian crisis ignores the crimanal reality apparent in every boatload of fit young men who make the trip. (Twitter comment) ### Comment by Giovanni de Briganti on 2022-01-11 09:34:17 +0000 So climate change has well-documented links to conflict? I’d like to see them (Twitter comment) ### Comment by Immortal Spirit on 2022-01-13 22:04:42 +0000 We’re no longer prepared to pay for it. (Twitter comment) ### Comment by Rethinking Security on 2022-01-14 14:10:45 +0000 An excellent read and thoughtful critique of the deeply conventional thinking that underpins the Integrated Review, and some considered alternatives, from a writer within the British Armed Forces. Kudos to @wavellroom for encouraging rethinking defence and security. (Twitter comment) ### Comment by Jon Lake on 2022-01-15 11:04:38 +0000 The problem with this essay is that it largely ignores the fact that there are multiple real threats, and the armed forces it sets out would be entirely unable to deter (let alone defeat) any of them. (Twitter comment) ### Comment by Philip Shetler-Jones on 2022-01-15 11:11:33 +0000 I really don’t think the R2P is a growing influence any more. (Twitter comment)